Stefan Lambrev wrote:
quoted text
> Andrew Thompson wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 05:26:35PM +0200, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
>>  
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> In my desire to increase network throughput, and to be able to 
>>> handle more then ~250-270kpps
>>> I started experimenting with lagg and link aggregation control 
>>> protocol (lacp).
>>> To my surprise this doesn't increase the amount of packets my server 
>>> can handle
>>>
>>> Using lagg doesn't improve situation at all, and also errors are not 
>>> reported.
>>> Also using lagg increased content switches:
>>>
>>> Top showed for CPU states +55%   system, which is quite high?
>>>
>>> I'll use hwpmc and lock_profiling to see where the kernel spends 
>>> it's time.
>>>     
>>
>> Thanks for investigating this. One thing to note is that ip flows from
>> the same connection always go down the same interface, this is because
>> Ethernet is not allowed to reorder frames. The hash uses
>> src-mac, dst-mac, src-ip and dst-ip (see lagg_hashmbuf), make sure when
>> performance testing that your traffic varies in these values. Adding
>> tcp/udp ports to the hashing may help.
>>   
> The traffic, that I generate is with random/spoofed src part, so it is 
> split between interfaces for sure :)
>
> Here you can find results when under load from hwpmc and lock_profiling:
> http://89.186.204.158/lock_profiling-lagg.txt
> http://89.186.204.158/lagg-gprof.txt
>
http://89.186.204.158/lagg2-gprof.txt I forget this file :)
quoted text
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"