Re: Performance Tracker project update

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@...>
Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@...>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org <freebsd-performance@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 4:59 pm

Robert Watson wrote:

I'd like to do that, but I'm a bit afraid of hitting the webserver too
hard. Data is changing constantly, so graphs are created on the fly. I
could probably cache some small versions though and put them on an
overview page.

>>> At some point the ability to annotate the data will become important

Good idea. Thanks!

> Finally, in the interests of making your life more complicated, it would

It's supported by the tools, database and website but currently I just
have 2 (slow) machines to work with at the university. The server is
churning out images for the slave to consume every 2 hours which is an
acceptable sample rate if the intent is to monitor CURRENT development
and provide performance alerts much like the tinderboxes do now. Adding
releases would seriously hurt that rate.

My focus has been strictly on comparing CVS versions because trying to
cover anything else quickly makes the configuration space explode and
the sample rate go down the drain. Lots of interesting comparisons could
be made, however, provided sufficient hardware supplies. Comparing
branches would on the top of the list.

Erik
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Kris Kennaway, (Wed Jan 23, 7:44 am)
Re: A specific example of a disk i/o problem, Thomas Backman, (Mon Oct 5, 4:45 am)
Re: ZFS, NFS and Network tuning (Paul Patterson), Paul Patterson, (Sun Dec 21, 12:50 pm)
Re: ZFS Re: A specific example of a disk i/o problem , Thomas Backman, (Tue Oct 6, 2:55 am)
Re: ZFS Re: A specific example of a disk i/o problem, O. Hartmann, (Tue Oct 6, 4:57 am)
Re: ZFS Re: A specific example of a disk i/o problem, Thomas Backman, (Tue Oct 6, 4:07 pm)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Borja Marcos, (Thu Jan 24, 4:53 am)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Ivan Voras, (Wed Jan 23, 8:16 pm)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Erik Cederstrand, (Thu Jan 24, 6:28 am)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Ivan Voras, (Thu Jan 24, 7:05 am)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Kris Kennaway, (Thu Jan 24, 7:06 am)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Ivan Voras, (Thu Jan 24, 7:15 am)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Kris Kennaway, (Thu Jan 24, 7:26 am)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Erik Cederstrand, (Wed Jan 23, 9:49 am)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Robert Watson, (Wed Jan 23, 3:40 pm)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Erik Cederstrand, (Wed Jan 23, 4:59 pm)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Alexander Leidinger, (Thu Jan 24, 3:58 am)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Erik Cederstrand, (Thu Jan 24, 6:02 am)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Kris Kennaway, (Thu Jan 24, 7:08 am)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Alexander Leidinger, (Thu Jan 24, 7:43 am)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Erik Cederstrand, (Thu Jan 24, 8:14 am)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Kris Kennaway, (Wed Jan 23, 3:11 pm)
Re: Performance Tracker project update, Kris Kennaway, (Wed Jan 23, 9:58 pm)