On 03/gen/2011, at 18:23, Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> wrote: Hello, John. You wrote 3 января 2011 г., 19:26:00: I've got this panic on reboot from geom_raid5. Could you please provide some backtrace? Have you got a core? Backtrace was were simple (I've reproduce it from my memory, but it really was that simple): <all debugger-related stuff> panic() thread_exit() kthread_exit() g_raid5_worker() fork_trampoline() ... No core, because I ...

This part I cannot help with as much (I'm not familiar with ATA/IDE/SATA specifics). I've cc'd mav@ who has done much of the recent work on our ATA drivers who is probably better able to answer this question. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

Unless loud objections are heard, I indend to commit the following patch, based on your submission. diff --git a/usr.sbin/rtprio/rtprio.c b/usr.sbin/rtprio/rtprio.c index 245f714..bdd61ea 100644 --- a/usr.sbin/rtprio/rtprio.c +++ b/usr.sbin/rtprio/rtprio.c @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$"); #include <sys/param.h> #include <sys/rtprio.h> -#include <sys/errno.h> #include <ctype.h> #include <err.h> @@ -46,22 +45,21 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$"); #include <string.h> #include ...

Hi, There was a reason my subject line was in the form of a question. When poking around various parts of the "crypt" I noticed that the code does something seemingly covered by an existing function so I decided to poke the relevant people about it. More generally - I don't like seeing old code do something on its own that we have an existing function for. However your post convinced me that gain of consistency is not worth the headaches it may cause. -- Eitan ...