Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Attila Nagy
Date: Saturday, January 1, 2011 - 11:18 am

On 12/16/2010 01:44 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
I've used this:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/stable-8-zfsv28-20101223-nopython.patch.xz
on a server with amd64, 8 G RAM, acting as a file server on 
ftp/http/rsync, the content being read only mounted with nullfs in 
jails, and the daemons use sendfile (ftp and http).

The effects can be seen here:
http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/freebsd/20110101-zfsv28-fbsd/
the exact moment of the switch can be seen on zfs_mem-week.png, where 
the L2 ARC has been discarded.

What I see:
- increased CPU load
- decreased L2 ARC hit rate, decreased SSD (ad[46]), therefore increased 
hard disk load (IOPS graph)

Maybe I could accept the higher system load as normal, because there 
were a lot of things changed between v15 and v28 (but I was hoping if I 
use the same feature set, it will require less CPU), but dropping the 
L2ARC hit rate so radically seems to be a major issue somewhere.
As you can see from the memory stats, I have enough kernel memory to 
hold the L2 headers, so the L2 devices got filled up to their maximum 
capacity.

Any ideas on what could cause these? I haven't upgraded the pool version 
and nothing was changed in the pool or in the file system.

Thanks,
_______________________________________________
freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Martin Matuska, (Thu Dec 16, 5:44 am)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Romain Garbage, (Fri Dec 17, 3:12 am)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Andrei V. Lavreniyuk, (Fri Dec 17, 4:04 am)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Krzysztof Dajka, (Sat Dec 18, 2:00 am)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Krzysztof Dajka, (Sat Dec 18, 12:58 pm)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Ruben van Staveren, (Tue Dec 21, 8:39 am)
Updated py-zfs ? Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Ruben van Staveren, (Thu Dec 23, 1:27 am)
Re: Updated py-zfs ? Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Martin Matuska, (Thu Dec 23, 1:58 am)
Re: Updated py-zfs ? Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Ruben van Staveren, (Thu Dec 23, 2:46 am)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, jhell, (Thu Dec 23, 4:17 pm)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Attila Nagy, (Sat Jan 1, 11:18 am)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Artem Belevich, (Sat Jan 1, 12:09 pm)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Attila Nagy, (Sat Jan 1, 12:23 pm)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, J. Hellenthal, (Sat Jan 1, 9:06 pm)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Attila Nagy, (Sun Jan 2, 1:45 am)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, J. Hellenthal, (Sun Jan 2, 3:38 pm)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Attila Nagy, (Mon Jan 3, 1:03 pm)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Bob Friesenhahn, (Mon Jan 3, 2:35 pm)
Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE, Attila Nagy, (Tue Jan 4, 11:52 am)