On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 05:17:12PM +0200, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
quoted text
> On 06-08-2010 15:50, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> >Correct, but synchronizartion should take much, much less time.
> >Is dirty count actually decreasing?
> >
> >   
> Hello,
> 
> Yes it was decreasing steadily but very slowly. It finished between 
> thursday
> evening and friday morning, and the dirty count is now 0. All in all it 
> took over
> 72 hours. It was transferring around 20mbits while doing this. However, 
> if I
> copied a large file to the primary HAST node, it would use up a lot more
> bandwidth. It is like HAST was synchronizing the "empty space" with lower
> priority or something. Does that make any sense ? The servers are not in
> production so I can perform any testing needed. Thank you for your reply.

It does make sense, but HAST is not doing this:) Could you start with
veryfing if synchronization is so slow also when you have only one
resource configured?

-- 
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheelsystems.com
pjd@FreeBSD.org                           http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!