| From | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Snow | Re: iscsi client hangs performing I/O on a dead target
You hit the nail on the head. This is going to be a increasingly bad
problem as we continue pushing in this of networked storage.
It would be REALLY nice, if an I/O fails, to simply have the process
attempting the I/O to be killed, instead of bringing the machine to its
knees and locking up or panic the kernel.
- Andrew
_______________________________________________
freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
To unsubscribe, send any ...
| Jan 7, 4:27 pm 2009 |
| Mateusz Guzik | Re: kern/130229: [iconv] usermount fails on fs that need iconv
The following reply was made to PR kern/130229; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
To: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/130229: [iconv] usermount fails on fs that need iconv
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:10:39 +0100
Hi,
this is a duplicate of kern/109024. As described, mount_msdosfs calls
kiconv_add_xlat16_cspairs and it fails. While mounting using root
credentials, kiconv_add_xlat16_cspairs is successfull and that's why
after ...
| Jan 6, 8:20 pm 2009 |
| 4ertus2 | Re: kern/130229: usermount fails on fs that need iconv
The following reply was made to PR kern/130229; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: 4ertus2 <4ertus2@mail.ru>
To: "Garrett Cooper" <yanefbsd@gmail.com>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/130229: usermount fails on fs that need iconv
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:59:01 +0300
> sysctl -n vfs.usermount says?
~> sysctl -n vfs.usermount
1
The problem looks like FreeBSD tryes to load *iconv modules the first time I mount filesystem, but user have't permitions for this ...
| Jan 6, 7:40 pm 2009 |
| Koen Smits | Re: FreeBSD, SSD's and partition alignment
Sorry for the late reply. I've been busy.
I agree with point 1, if the controller is able to 'save up' small writes
and write this sequentially without making a mess out of it, this is
preferred. We will never completely remove the 'virtual layers' between the
OS and the storage medium itself and that is fine.
point 2 however, i disagree. It's time we dump the whole track/cylinder/head
thing. Even back in 1984 this was already outdated, lets just throw it
overboard! Let's assume that from ...
| Jan 7, 5:54 am 2009 |
| previous day | today | next day |
|---|---|---|
| January 6, 2009 | January 7, 2009 | January 8, 2009 |
