freebsd-fs mailing list

FromSubjectsort iconDate
Andrew Snow
Re: iscsi client hangs performing I/O on a dead target
You hit the nail on the head. This is going to be a increasingly bad problem as we continue pushing in this of networked storage. It would be REALLY nice, if an I/O fails, to simply have the process attempting the I/O to be killed, instead of bringing the machine to its knees and locking up or panic the kernel. - Andrew _______________________________________________ freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs To unsubscribe, send any ...
Jan 7, 4:27 pm 2009
Mateusz Guzik
Re: kern/130229: [iconv] usermount fails on fs that need iconv
The following reply was made to PR kern/130229; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/130229: [iconv] usermount fails on fs that need iconv Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:10:39 +0100 Hi, this is a duplicate of kern/109024. As described, mount_msdosfs calls kiconv_add_xlat16_cspairs and it fails. While mounting using root credentials, kiconv_add_xlat16_cspairs is successfull and that's why after ...
Jan 6, 8:20 pm 2009
4ertus2
Re: kern/130229: usermount fails on fs that need iconv
The following reply was made to PR kern/130229; it has been noted by GNATS. From: 4ertus2 <4ertus2@mail.ru> To: "Garrett Cooper" <yanefbsd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/130229: usermount fails on fs that need iconv Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:59:01 +0300 > sysctl -n vfs.usermount says? ~> sysctl -n vfs.usermount 1 The problem looks like FreeBSD tryes to load *iconv modules the first time I mount filesystem, but user have't permitions for this ...
Jan 6, 7:40 pm 2009
Koen Smits
Re: FreeBSD, SSD's and partition alignment
Sorry for the late reply. I've been busy. I agree with point 1, if the controller is able to 'save up' small writes and write this sequentially without making a mess out of it, this is preferred. We will never completely remove the 'virtual layers' between the OS and the storage medium itself and that is fine. point 2 however, i disagree. It's time we dump the whole track/cylinder/head thing. Even back in 1984 this was already outdated, lets just throw it overboard! Let's assume that from ...
Jan 7, 5:54 am 2009
previous daytodaynext day
January 6, 2009January 7, 2009January 8, 2009