Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Danny Carroll
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 - 11:40 pm

Koen Smits wrote:


Sorry for the delay.

Areca got back to me.  It took a few days but I got someone who seemed
to know what they were talking about.

be writeback or writethrough in some situations but when that is not an
option, writethrough is the default.  I could not get any information
about read caching although I might send an email to see what happens.

Here is the transcript of the conversation:
Me:
I have a rather simple question about the 1231 controller.
Can you please explain the difference between using disks in JBOD mode
and using disks in passthrough mode.   I have a feeling that the
controller uses it's onboard cache when in passthrough mode.  Is this
the case?

Also, are both read and write operations cached?

Areca Support:
Dear Sir,
the only difference is
in JBOD mode, controller configure all drives as passthrough disk.
in RAID mode, you have to configure passthrough disk by yourself in RAID
mode

in other words, you can use raid with passthrough disks at saem time in
RAID mode but JBOD mode not.

Me:
So does that mean if I use passthrough, I am not protected by the
cache/battery backup?  I ask because there is an option for cache mode
when creating a passthrough disk.  i.e. Write-Back or Write-Through

Areca Support:
Dear Sir,
in JBOD mode, the default setting writeback mode.

with writeback mode, you will need a battery module to protect the data
remain in cache in case you got a power failure problem.

Me:
And so in Passthrough mode I am still protected with the battery backup?

So JBOD = WriteBack Cache with protection of the battery backup.
Passthrough = WriteBack or WriteThrough also with protection of the
battery backup.

Is this correct?

Areca Support:
Dear Sir,
if you have battery module attached, yes.








_______________________________________________
freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Jeremy Chadwick, (Thu Oct 30, 8:32 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Oct 30, 9:07 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Jeremy Chadwick, (Thu Oct 30, 9:34 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Andrew Snow, (Thu Oct 30, 9:44 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Oct 30, 9:47 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Oct 30, 9:50 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Oct 30, 9:55 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Peter Schuller, (Sun Nov 2, 8:09 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing. , Dieter, (Wed Nov 12, 3:57 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Wed Nov 12, 10:46 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Jeremy Chadwick, (Thu Nov 13, 12:43 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Willem Jan Withagen, (Thu Nov 13, 1:32 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Nov 13, 4:09 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Nov 13, 6:59 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Nikolay Denev, (Thu Nov 13, 8:06 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Scott Long, (Thu Nov 13, 9:49 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Nov 13, 1:46 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Nov 13, 1:59 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Eirik Øverby, (Sun Nov 16, 1:27 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Sun Nov 16, 8:15 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Matt Simerson, (Sun Nov 16, 11:06 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Jeremy Chadwick, (Mon Nov 17, 12:08 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Wes Morgan, (Mon Nov 17, 4:26 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Mon Nov 17, 4:43 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Matt Simerson, (Mon Nov 17, 2:04 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Matt Simerson, (Mon Nov 17, 3:07 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Mon Nov 17, 4:46 pm)
RE: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Jan Mikkelsen, (Tue Dec 2, 3:38 am)
RE: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Wes Morgan, (Tue Dec 2, 5:04 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Wed Jan 7, 5:33 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Zaphod Beeblebrox, (Thu Jan 8, 12:40 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Koen Smits, (Thu Jan 8, 12:48 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Nikolay Denev, (Thu Jan 8, 2:19 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Jan 8, 7:30 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Koen Smits, (Fri Jan 9, 1:46 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Fri Jan 9, 2:02 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Koen Smits, (Fri Jan 9, 8:58 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Andrew Snow, (Fri Jan 9, 7:38 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Fri Jan 9, 9:58 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Tue Jan 20, 11:40 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Koen Smits, (Wed Jan 21, 2:16 am)