Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing.

Previous thread: Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing. by Jeremy Chadwick on Thursday, October 30, 2008 - 8:32 pm. (41 messages)

Next thread: Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing. by Simun Mikecin on Friday, October 31, 2008 - 4:57 am. (1 message)
From: Simun Mikecin
Date: Friday, October 31, 2008 - 2:20 am

There is no point in setting vm.kmem_size_max. Setting
vm.kmem_size is enough. vm.kmem_size_max is used for
auto-tuning of kmem size which is in this case actually

Can you explain why would you have to decrease kmem_size to
use larger ARC?
AFAIK it should be contrary to what you are saying: when
you use larger kmem_size you can also use larger arc_max.

My suggestion if you are using kmem_size of 1536M would be
to not tune arc_min and arc_max if your system isn't
panicing. If it does you should try decreasing arc_max (from
it's default value) until it doesn't.



      
_______________________________________________
freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Previous thread: Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing. by Jeremy Chadwick on Thursday, October 30, 2008 - 8:32 pm. (41 messages)

Next thread: Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing. by Simun Mikecin on Friday, October 31, 2008 - 4:57 am. (1 message)