Re: DHCP server in base

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: M. Warner Losh
Date: Friday, September 17, 2010 - 8:28 am

In message: <4C91100C.5060502@FreeBSD.org>
            Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: > Most of the code is there anyway, and it isn't evolving as fast as
: > BIND.
: 
: That is actually a more rational argument, even if I don't agree with
: it. FWIW, part of the reason that I don't agree with it is that at
: some point, hopefully in the near future, we will want to include the
: DHCPv6 client in the mix somewhere; and when we do the code base is
: not going to be as stable as we have enjoyed so far with the v4
: dhclient.

True, but that still won't change the dynamic that adding a dhcp
server is easy give we have most of one already in the tree.  Adding
v6 support likely will mean a certain amount of code churn, I'll grant
you that.  But the code/api churn that's happening is within a single
program, making it much easier to MFC as necessary to keep up.

: > This is analogous: we
: > have good opportunity to integrate into the system, and users benefit
: > from that integration.
: 
: Given your perspective of wanting more of a complete system in the
: base I can certainly see how you would be supportive of this
: change. My intent was to make the argument in a general way that this
: is the wrong direction to go, and that users would benefit *more* from
: a robust modularized system. The fact that the v4 DHCPd might
: accidentally be a good candidate for including in the base today
: doesn't mean that doing so is the right strategy for the long term.

I take a more nuanced view: we have to evaluate each proposed addition
to the system on its merits.  One of these criteria is long term
viability, but others include how useful is it to the users; how much
demand will there be; will including it make the project look good?;
will not including it make the project look bad?; etc

We'd all like to see a more modular base, but until that nut is
cracked, we have a balancing act to perform.

Warner
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
DHCP server in base, David DEMELIER, (Fri Sep 10, 7:45 am)
Re: DHCP server in base, Alex Dupre, (Fri Sep 10, 8:29 am)
Re: DHCP server in base, Scott Robbins, (Fri Sep 10, 9:24 am)
Re: DHCP server in base, Matthew Jacob, (Fri Sep 10, 9:28 am)
Re: DHCP server in base, David DEMELIER, (Fri Sep 10, 9:54 am)
Re: DHCP server in base, Doug Barton, (Fri Sep 10, 11:36 am)
Re: DHCP server in base, Julien Laffaye, (Fri Sep 10, 12:06 pm)
Re: DHCP server in base, Freddie Cash, (Fri Sep 10, 12:35 pm)
Re: DHCP server in base, Aleksandr Rybalko, (Fri Sep 10, 1:48 pm)
Re: DHCP server in base, jhell, (Fri Sep 10, 4:14 pm)
Re: DHCP server in base, jhell, (Fri Sep 10, 4:16 pm)
Re: DHCP server in base, Doug Barton, (Fri Sep 10, 5:33 pm)
Re: DHCP server in base, Aleksandr Rybalko, (Sat Sep 11, 6:06 am)
Re: DHCP server in base, David DEMELIER, (Mon Sep 13, 12:53 pm)
Re: DHCP server in base, Gordon Tetlow, (Mon Sep 13, 1:55 pm)
Re: DHCP server in base, David DEMELIER, (Mon Sep 13, 10:11 pm)
Re: DHCP server in base, Marian Hettwer, (Tue Sep 14, 3:57 am)
Re: DHCP server in base, David DEMELIER, (Tue Sep 14, 10:13 am)
Re: DHCP server in base, M. Warner Losh, (Wed Sep 15, 7:25 am)
Re: DHCP server in base, Doug Barton, (Wed Sep 15, 11:27 am)
Re: DHCP server in base, M. Warner Losh, (Fri Sep 17, 8:28 am)
Re: DHCP server in base, Darren Pilgrim, (Sat Sep 25, 1:10 pm)
Re: DHCP server in base, Marcin Cieslak, (Sat Sep 25, 2:09 pm)
Re: DHCP server in base, krad, (Sat Sep 25, 2:19 pm)
Re: DHCP server in base, David DEMELIER, (Sun Sep 26, 12:34 am)