I agree with Matt on this one, although that shouldn't be a surprise
since I'm on record saying it often. :)
Unfortunately arguing to include something new in the base because
something else that you don't agree with is already there is not a valid
method. The bar is a lot higher for adding things than keeping things
(for better or worse).
As I've said many times, I'm ready to have it out when there is
consensus to do so. The usual discussion goes like this:
1. Get BIND out of the base!
2. If we remove it, the command line tools (dig, host, nslookup) go with it.
3. Oh, well, we like those, so keep them, but get rid of the rest!
4. BIND is library based, so 90% of the work to make the command line
tools is building the libs, after which building the server and its
accessories is trivial work.
5. Oh, well, then make knobs to disable the server!
6. That's already done.
7. Oh, well, never mind then *mumble mumble*
However, all that is likely to change at some point in the future (as
in, years from now) when BIND 10 becomes the only and/or most viable
option since it requires a lot of stuff that we are unlikely to ever
import into the base (like boost, python, etc.). So there is hope for
you anti-BIND folks yet! :)
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"