Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Pyun YongHyeon
Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2010 - 3:12 pm

On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:55:30PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:

I don't know why Broadocom uses 'Quick'. It's a just buffer
descriptor chain for TX/RX.


The maximum BD chain would be number of configured TX/RX descriptors.
And 1 would be minimum value as you have to want to get status block
for each TX/RX. Finding best value may depend on specific load.


BD chain is just one of parameters. bce(4) controllers also provide
more advanced features that fine control interrupt moderation(TX/RX
ticks). It's hard to explain all the details so you may want to
read public data sheet of bce(4).
http://www.broadcom.com/collateral/pg/NetXtremeII-PG203-R.pdf
See host coalescing registers(page 484).


Not sure but it does not explain increasing
dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers counter.

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, Ian FREISLICH, (Fri Mar 5, 4:20 am)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, Pyun YongHyeon, (Fri Mar 5, 10:56 am)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss , Ian FREISLICH, (Fri Mar 5, 11:16 am)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, Pyun YongHyeon, (Fri Mar 5, 11:40 am)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, Pyun YongHyeon, (Fri Mar 5, 2:04 pm)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, Pyun YongHyeon, (Fri Mar 5, 2:55 pm)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, Pyun YongHyeon, (Mon Mar 8, 10:49 am)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, Pyun YongHyeon, (Tue Mar 9, 1:49 pm)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, Pyun YongHyeon, (Tue Mar 9, 2:21 pm)
RE: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, David Christensen, (Tue Mar 9, 2:31 pm)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, Pyun YongHyeon, (Tue Mar 9, 2:40 pm)
RE: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, David Christensen, (Tue Mar 9, 3:04 pm)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, Pyun YongHyeon, (Tue Mar 9, 3:12 pm)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, Fabien Thomas, (Tue Mar 9, 3:55 pm)
RE: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, David Christensen, (Tue Mar 9, 4:00 pm)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss , Ian FREISLICH, (Tue Mar 9, 10:48 pm)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss , Ian FREISLICH, (Wed Mar 10, 2:05 am)
RE: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, David Christensen, (Wed Mar 10, 12:11 pm)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, Pyun YongHyeon, (Wed Mar 10, 12:52 pm)
RE: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, David Christensen, (Wed Mar 10, 3:45 pm)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, Pyun YongHyeon, (Wed Mar 10, 4:02 pm)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss , Ian FREISLICH, (Wed Mar 10, 11:46 pm)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss , Ian FREISLICH, (Thu Mar 11, 12:06 am)
RE: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss, David Christensen, (Fri Mar 12, 4:58 pm)
Re: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss , Ian FREISLICH, (Sat Mar 13, 10:06 am)