On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:27:06 +0300, Alex Keda <admin@lissyara.su> wrote:
quoted text > On 05.03.2010 14:16, Doug Rabson wrote:
>> On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:10:43 +0300, Alex Keda<admin@lissyara.su>
wrote:
quoted text >>
>>> On 05.03.2010 13:59, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>>
>>>> In message<4B90E171.2040808@lissyara.su>, Alex Keda writes:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> then can a more correct name of the project or ClosedBSD or
>>>>>
>> ManagedBSD?
>>
>>>>> =)
>>>>> or something abstract?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> You are free to use any other operating system of your choice, if you
>>>> are not happy with FreeBSD.
>>>>
>>>> Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'm not going anywhere, not even hope for it =)
>>> I'm trying to make FreeBSD a better, more logical.
>>> Maybe that's not very successful, but judging by the number of
>>> responses, it hurt many, and made to think even more people.
>>>
>> I think you misunderstand. Some of us old-timers have been having this
>> discussion repeatedly for well over ten years. It always ends up the
same
quoted text >> way - a re-org might make the source tree marginally prettier but the
>> consequences for long-term maintenance and supporting downstream
>> contributors outweigh any possible benefit. Having the same
conversation
quoted text >> every two years with the same outcome gets annoying.
>>
> And the fact that this issue was raised with enviable regularity - not
> make you think that it really needs to be done?
Read what I wrote. Consequences outweigh benefits so no. On the other
hand, if you are just trolling, please try somewhere else.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
