Re: Event based scheduling and USB.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alexander Motin
Date: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 - 1:14 am

Nate Lawson wrote:

Not exactly. I've only made system to delay empty ticks when idle and
execute them later on wakeup in a batch. Scheduler work is still wanted.


As I understand, if respective USB port is not used, USB stack should
put it into power_save mode not poll so often to deny entering C3 state.


HPET timer is not a regular ISA or PCI device. It allows several
different interrupt configurations. In most cases I remember, BIOS
setups interrupts 0 and 8, like for legacy_route mode. But this mode is
not really suitable as default in our case ATM due to conflict with
atrtc and attimer drivers.

-- 
Alexander Motin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Event based scheduling and USB., Takanori Watanabe, (Tue Oct 26, 12:04 pm)
Re: Event based scheduling and USB., Alexander Motin, (Tue Oct 26, 12:57 pm)
Re: Event based scheduling and USB., Nate Lawson, (Tue Oct 26, 3:44 pm)
Re: Event based scheduling and USB., Hans Petter Selasky, (Wed Oct 27, 12:14 am)
Re: Event based scheduling and USB., Alexander Leidinger, (Wed Oct 27, 12:58 am)
Re: Event based scheduling and USB., Alexander Motin, (Wed Oct 27, 1:14 am)
Re: Event based scheduling and USB., Hans Petter Selasky, (Wed Oct 27, 1:50 am)
Re: Event based scheduling and USB., Alexander Motin, (Fri Oct 29, 1:44 pm)