Re: [RFC] More meaningful information about ENOEXEC for kldload(8)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Garrett Cooper
Date: Monday, October 25, 2010 - 5:53 pm

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:

    Well.. I'm not saying the current output is the best, but I just
don't want to dig a deeper hole that will further confuse people, as
some users may get even more confused with additional details.


    Wouldn't noting this in the manpage be sufficient?
    I ran into this `item' (:)..) today after a power outage because
nvidia-driver was built against different kernel headers, and it
prints out the error clear as day on /dev/console, so I'm tempted to
say that documenting the behavior is enough as long as it's clear that
that is in fact the behavior that the user is dealing with :).
Thanks!
-Garrett
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] More meaningful information about ENOEXEC for kl ..., Garrett Cooper, (Mon Oct 25, 5:53 pm)
Strange hang HPET in current , Andrey Smagin, (Wed Oct 27, 12:33 am)
Re: Strange hang HPET in current, Alexander Motin, (Fri Oct 29, 6:55 am)
Re: Strange hang HPET in current, Alexander Motin, (Fri Oct 29, 7:04 am)