Does this imply that the nfs/krpc hack of:
oldcred = td->td_ucred;
td->td_ucred = "some other cred ptr"
...
td->td_ucred = oldcred;
could be dangerous?
Maybe it should be converted to code that replaces the contents instead
of replacing the *cred? (Variants of the above live in a bunch of places
in the krpc, nlm and nfs code, due to the fact that the socket functions
use td->td_ucred in various places.)
rick
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"