At 03:31 PM 7/3/2009, Alexander Motin wrote:We dont have too many disk I/O bound apps here. Where we do, we typically have used raid controllers in RAID10. But I will experiment a little more over the weekend. For us, we are interested in large amounts of storage for backup purposes. Having things like port multiplier features are very nice to have. But I will try some random io tests to see if I can measure a difference. Looking in the BIOS, I am able to toggle IDE and RAID mode only for the eSata controller portion, where as I have IDE, AHCI and RAID for the onboard Intel controller. ---Mike _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Alan Stern | Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 |
| Satyam Sharma | Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures |
| William Lee Irwin III | Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS] |
git: | |
| Dale Farnsworth | Re: [PATCH 03/39] mv643xx_eth: shorten reg names |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: HTB accuracy for high speed |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
