On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:Yes, if some file that was in that directory is still open (or mmap'd and the process hasn't yet exit()'d), it will exist as a file named ".nfsXXX" until the v_usecount goes to 0 and then it's removed, which would explain it. Afraid not. NFSv4 has an Open, but it is an open share lock and not a POSIX style open, so NFSv4 clients still do the silly rename. (ie. The NFSv4 Remove Op is defined as removing the file and not just unlinking it and the NFSv4 server isn't required to retain the file after removal if it is Open'd by a client.) rick _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
| monstr | [PATCH 27/56] microblaze_v2: support for a.out |
| Andrew Morton | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| mdew . | Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v4 |
| Gabriel C | Re: 2.6.21-mm1 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Willy Tarreau | Re: [PATCH] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
