Andrew Reilly <andrew-freebsd@areilly.bpc-users.org> writes:...but they cannot take advantage of the full capabilities of amd64 (not just address space, but larger number of general-purpose registers etc.) Even further, an i386 binary built for maximum compatibility cannot assume SSE2 support, while an amd64 binary can. Conversely, there are (admittedly not many, but some) workloads that run faster on i386 than on amd64. Imagine having a single binary distribution and a single install CD or DVD that runs unmodified on i386 and amd64 - that would cover 90% or more of our user base. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
