Kris Kennaway wrote:
quoted text
> Ivan Voras wrote:
>> Robert Watson wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned this yet in the thread, but=20
>>> another thing worth taking into account in considering the stability =

quoted text
>>> of ZFS is whether or not Sun considers it a production feature in=20
>>> Solaris.  Last I heard, it was still considered an experimental=20
>>> feature there as well.
>>
>> Last I heard, rsync didn't crash Solaris on ZFS :)
>=20
> [Citation needed]

I can't provide citation about a thing that doesn't happen - you don't=20
hear things like "oh and yesterday I ran rsync on my Solaris with ZFS=20
and *it didn't crash*!" often.

But, with some grains of salt taken, consider this Google results:

* searching for "rsync crash solaris zfs": 790 results, most of them=20
obviously irrelevant
* searching for "rsync crash freebsd zfs": 10,800 results; a small=20
number of the results is from this thread, some are duplicates, but it's =

a large number in any case.

I feel that the number of Solaris+ZFS installations worldwide is larger=20
than that of FreeBSD+ZFS and they've had ZFS longer.