On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 02:26:53AM +0600, Vadim Goncharov wrote:Other than your previous post, I don't recall seeing this claim before. Can you provide references to people stating that they are abandoning FreeBSD because it doesn't support swap reservation? I've had a quick look at can't find anything. Definitely, no-one considers it enough of a problem to have raised a PR. Since you're making the claim, how about _you_ produce the evidence. In general, swap over-commit is a good idea because it enables you to get by with far less resources than would otherwise be necessary - I've disabled swap reservation on some systems at work to allieviate problems that it was causing and I haven't seen any subsequent issues due to overcommit being in use. --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH x86] [0/16] Various i386/x86-64 changes |
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
