Re: sbrk(2), OOM-killer and malloc() overcommit

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@...>
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org <freebsd-current@...>
Date: Friday, January 4, 2008 - 2:32 pm

04.01.08 @ 23:36 Tim Kientzle wrote:


What applications? How do they use this "feature"?


That's not a solution for end-user. Why just not have space reserving, as  
other operating systems can guarantee to their applications that stable  
availability of memory?

-- 
WBR, Vadim Goncharov
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
sbrk(2), OOM-killer and malloc() overcommit, Vadim Goncharov, (Fri Jan 4, 11:08 am)
Re: sbrk(2), OOM-killer and malloc() overcommit, Peter Jeremy, (Fri Jan 4, 3:28 pm)
Re: sbrk(2), OOM-killer and malloc() overcommit, Vadim Goncharov, (Fri Jan 4, 4:26 pm)
Re: sbrk(2), OOM-killer and malloc() overcommit, Peter Jeremy, (Fri Jan 4, 9:10 pm)
Re: sbrk(2), OOM-killer and malloc() overcommit, Vadim Goncharov, (Sat Jan 5, 10:44 am)
Re: sbrk(2), OOM-killer and malloc() overcommit, Dag-Erling Smørgrav, (Mon Jan 7, 10:58 am)
Re: sbrk(2), OOM-killer and malloc() overcommit, Vadim Goncharov, (Mon Jan 7, 12:06 pm)
Re: sbrk(2), OOM-killer and malloc() overcommit, Tim Kientzle, (Fri Jan 4, 1:36 pm)
Re: sbrk(2), OOM-killer and malloc() overcommit, Vadim Goncharov, (Fri Jan 4, 2:32 pm)