In message <20080104122149.GA17103@nagual.pp.ru>, Andrey Chernov writes:No, the VM system has a much better idea about this. You need to think about this the right way: There is address space allocated to the process (via sbrk/mmap) A subset of this, is address space allocated by the program (via malloc) ...and then there is memory actually in use, which is an entirely different thing, of which we currently only have some kind of clue in the VM system. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 28/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 3 (client side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Tantilov, Emil S | WARNING: at include/net/sock.h:417 udp_lib_unhash |
