Re: Memory problem with latest malloc.c

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jason Evans <jasone@...>
Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@...>, current <current@...>
Date: Thursday, January 3, 2008 - 2:15 am

On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 22:12 -0800, Jason Evans wrote:
to=20
=20
=20
e=20

Yeah, I just realized that after looking at the memory usage of rev
1.154 (it's the same).  I could tweak kern.maxdsiz in loader.conf, but ~
1 GB is way too much memory for this program.  I know what causes the
extra memory usage, so I think I'll bug the Evolution guys.  Thanks.

t=20

It may not be obvious to all users and I think many will be bit by this
(i.e. POLA violation) considering maxdsiz is 512 MB on i386.  Having DM
the default would be a good idea IMHO.

Joe

--=20
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team      ::      gnome@FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Memory problem with latest malloc.c, Joe Marcus Clarke, (Wed Jan 2, 6:49 pm)
Re: Memory problem with latest malloc.c, Ivan Voras, (Thu Jan 3, 6:27 am)
Re: Memory problem with latest malloc.c, Jason Evans, (Wed Jan 2, 10:26 pm)
Re: Memory problem with latest malloc.c, Joe Marcus Clarke, (Thu Jan 3, 2:00 am)
Re: Memory problem with latest malloc.c, Jason Evans, (Thu Jan 3, 2:12 am)
Re: Memory problem with latest malloc.c, Joe Marcus Clarke, (Thu Jan 3, 2:15 am)