2008/1/26, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>:
quoted text
> Yar Tikhiy wrote:
>
> > No doubt. :-) But the urgency of this problem appears much lower
> > than that I estimated in the first place--fortunately.  Broken UFS
> > would be a nightmare.
>
> IMO if we're going to ship NTFS support in the base it should actually
> function, or at minimum not panic the box. As I reported earlier, I can
> panic my -current system with 100% reliability with fairly light access
> to an NTFS volume, which I consider to be a fairly large problem, at
> least for my personal usage pattern.

I'm not sure now, are you referring to some problems introduced by my
patches or not?

Thanks,
Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"