Re: panic: System call lstat returning with 1 locks held

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@...>
Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@...>, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@...>, <freebsd-current@...>
Date: Saturday, January 26, 2008 - 12:42 pm

Yar Tikhiy wrote:


IMO if we're going to ship NTFS support in the base it should actually 
function, or at minimum not panic the box. As I reported earlier, I can 
panic my -current system with 100% reliability with fairly light access 
to an NTFS volume, which I consider to be a fairly large problem, at 
least for my personal usage pattern.

Doug

-- 

     This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
panic: System call lstat returning with 1 locks held, Scot Hetzel, (Tue Jan 15, 9:52 am)
Re: panic: System call lstat returning with 1 locks held, Kostik Belousov, (Tue Jan 15, 10:39 am)
Re: panic: System call lstat returning with 1 locks held, Doug Barton, (Sat Jan 26, 12:42 pm)
Re: panic: System call lstat returning with 1 locks held, Pawel Jakub Dawidek, (Thu Jan 17, 7:40 am)
Re: panic: System call lstat returning with 1 locks held, Norikatsu Shigemura, (Fri Jan 18, 12:55 pm)
Re: panic: System call lstat returning with 1 locks held, Kris Kennaway, (Wed Jan 16, 5:55 am)
Re: panic: System call lstat returning with 1 locks held, John Baldwin, (Wed Jan 16, 11:11 am)