On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:26:53PM +0100, Pawel Worach wrote:
quoted text > Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 04:42:36AM +0100, Pawel Worach wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>While starting console-kit-daemon (sysutils/consolekit 0.2.3) during=20
> >>boot or in single-user mode the system panics. If I start it post-boot=
=20
quoted text > >>it runs fine. This is on 8.0-CURRENT from about 12 hours ago, another=
=20
quoted text > >>user also reported the same on RELENG_7. Any other information I can=20
> >>provide ?
> >>
> >>Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> >>fault virtual address =3D 0x4
> >>fault code =3D supervisor read, page not present
> >>instruction pointer =3D 0x20:0xc04d2ab4
> >>stack pointer =3D 0x28:0xe6499b18
> >>frame pointer =3D 0x28:0xe6499b80
> >>code segment =3D base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
> >> =3D DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
> >>processor eflags =3D interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL =3D 0
> >>current process =3D 134 (console-kit-daemon)
> >>Physical memory: 1014 MB
> >>Dumping 43 MB: 28 12
> >>
> >>#8 0xc07a34a2 in trap (frame=3D0xe6499ad8) at=20
> >>/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:489
> >>#9 0xc079183b in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:146
> >>#10 0xc04d2ab4 in scioctl (dev=3D0xc3b20d00, cmd=3D537163270,
> >> data=3D0xe6499c70 "__PLACEHOLDER__2_2", flag=3D1, td=3D0xc3d3c880)
> >> at /usr/src/sys/dev/syscons/syscons.c:1073
> >>#11 0xc051ed1a in giant_ioctl (dev=3D0xc3b20d00, cmd=3D537163270,
> >> data=3D0xe6499c70 "__PLACEHOLDER__2_2", fflag=3D1, td=3D0xc3d3c880)
> >> at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_conf.c:349
> >>#12 0xc0598194 in cnioctl (dev=3D0xc3b20d00, cmd=3D537163270,
> >> data=3D0xe6499c70 "__PLACEHOLDER__2_2", flag=3D1, td=3D0xc3d3c880)
> >>---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
> >> at /usr/src/sys/kern/tty_cons.c:521
> >
> >Unless the virtual screen is opened, the screen state scr_stat structure
> >is not allocated. The following patch would fix the panic, but I do not
> >know how the console-kit would react to the ENXIO from the
> >VT_WAITACTIVE ioctl. Please, test it.
>=20
> Thanks! The patch works.
To clarify: do you see any problems with the console-kit after the patch ?
In particular, can you verify that the program functions correctly, esp.
on the virtual terminals 1, 2 ... , whatever this means ?
