Underlying OS.
Daily. Updating.
Easy to implement ports.
Slow rebuild of portupgrade database (much improved in recent versions).
In my experience, people from a Windoze background don't understand
dependencies at all. Everything "just happens" under the hood during
the install. This gives the impression that installing software works
better under Windoze, but this impression is false. Dependency bugs (in
the form of inconsistent/out-dated DLLs) have been a source of
instability since the beginning.
Yes.
However, to be acceptable, porting software into the build environment
as to be at least as easy as it is now. In fact, porting is far more
important than installing.
This is my 8th year.
Development, port maintenance, writing (desktop applications).
In the best of all possible worlds, installs would be self-contained
(they would install correctly on the target with no intervention from
the user). In the real world, I want 3rd party software to follow the
ports system (whatever it may be). If 3rd part software does NOT track
the ports systems, all manner of difficult-to-debug bugs will propagate.
a => 4 (but see GNOME, KDE, and Webmin)
b => 8
c => 10
d => 6
e => 8
High.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"