Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote:t Of course, I mean no disrespect to the machines :) I know they are fully functional - there's really no difference once you get a full kernel to boot on them. But you'll agree that there's not much file system traffic on a network router (with the services you listed). I'm interested in how SSD could help me (if they actually can) with large-ish systems running web servers with associated software (e.g. database) and office-like servers. So far, I'm having trouble envisioning a seek-intensive storage application that's also temporary (to avoid keeping the "real" data on flash drives). Maybe a mail server queue, with mailboxes on standard drives?
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 009/196] Chinese: add translation of sparse.txt |
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Stephen Rothwell | Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Wenji Wu | A Linux TCP SACK Question |
