David Duchscher wrote:Not in transfer rate, but it could help hugely with seek-intensive IO loads (since seeks are instantaneous on flash or other solid-state drives). In theory, they could be of immense benefit for databases and seek-intensive operations on file systems, but the limited bulk transfer rates and relatively small sizes (for decent money) currently prevent their wide-spread use. It would be logical to use a limited size SSD for something like a file system journal for a large file system, except that these kind of journals are usually not seek-intensive :) If a NVRAM or SSD, or other technology presents the drive as a (S)ATA drive, there's no reason it shouldn't.
| Linus Torvalds | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
| Ingo Molnar | [patch 03/13] syslets: generic kernel bits |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gregory Haskins | [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
