Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: fluffles.net <bsd@...>
Cc: <freebsd-current@...>, Arne Woerner <arne_woerner@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2007 - 2:17 pm

Quoting "fluffles.net" <bsd@fluffles.net>:
st 

I would like to see this get wider testing and eventually be included 
as well. A few questions (some of which I know the answer to but would 
like to have you field for the list):

Where can I get/test/review the code?

Is there still any focus on the "previous" generation code or is "TNG" 
where everything is happening now? Which generation are you talking 
about above?

Does the code in the FreeBSD perforce repository represent the latest 
improvements? Which generation?

How much and what kinds of testing has it already received? What is the 
relationship between the FreeNAS project and the geom_raid5 
developer(s)? What version(s) of the code is/are in FreeNAS? Has the 
FreeNAS project or anyone else done any (preferrably thorough and 
repeatable) testing for correctness, stability and performance? Are the 
methods and/or results publicly available?

Just who is (/are) the developer(s) behind this code?

Where can I get more information? Can the information on your blog be 
considered authoritative?

What is the status of the code? Are there any known outstanding issues 
or poorly tested functionality/configurations?

Are there any threads on the freebsd-geom or other mailing lists that 
would be enlightening? Has a call for testing and/or code review been 
made on that list recently?

Thanks. :)

JN

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, fluffles.net, (Tue Nov 6, 10:16 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Oliver Fromme, (Wed Nov 14, 2:53 pm)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Arne W, (Wed Nov 14, 3:10 pm)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Oliver Fromme, (Thu Nov 15, 11:14 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Arne W, (Thu Nov 15, 12:05 pm)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, John Nielsen, (Tue Nov 6, 2:17 pm)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Arne W, (Tue Nov 6, 3:33 pm)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Ulf Lilleengen, (Wed Nov 7, 1:09 pm)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Arne W, (Wed Nov 7, 2:57 pm)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Ulf Lilleengen, (Wed Nov 7, 5:06 pm)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Arne W, (Wed Nov 7, 6:16 pm)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Ivan Voras, (Wed Nov 7, 6:48 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Arne W, (Wed Nov 7, 8:17 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Ivan Voras, (Wed Nov 7, 8:50 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, 韓家標 Bill Hacker, (Wed Nov 7, 9:08 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Ivan Voras, (Wed Nov 7, 9:23 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, 韓家標 Bill Hacker, (Wed Nov 7, 10:01 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Arne W, (Wed Nov 7, 8:56 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Nikolay Pavlov, (Tue Nov 6, 5:00 pm)