Mike Tancsa wrote:
quoted text
> At 07:26 AM 11/21/2007, Barney Cordoba wrote:
>> I've done a bit of research and it seems that this
>> chipset has been ignored for years now by the FreeBSD
>> team. Whats the reasoning for a major chipset used by
>
> I think you are jumping to conclusions.  I have a HT1000 chipset board 
> and have been using it just fine for some time. 
> (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-November/079920.html) 
>
> There obviously are some cases were it does not, so its harder to 
> track down than just a case of spending 0.  If you do have such a 
> board that does not work, perhaps make the offer of sending the 
> problem board to a developer who is interested in fixing the issue.
That would be an excelent idea :)

As usual I'll try to get any ATA/SATA HW that shows up on my doorstep 
working, thats the deal.
I dont have the means nor the motivation to spend my own hard earned $$ 
on all kinds of HW to get someone out there free support, simple as that..

That said, I do have a HT1000 based board around a supermicro H8SSL that 
is used as a busy local fileserver, needless to say it works flawlessly.

So, to get this worked on and hopefully fixed, get me a failing board to 
work on here... private mail with address details etc can be had on 
request...

-Søren

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"