Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Arne W
Date: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 - 12:10 pm

--- Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> wrote:
Hi Oliver (or should I say inof)? :-)

Nope... graid5 doesnt do such things... I found no way, that could do it
without hurting the disks too much (I was afraid, that a power failure could
destroy the necessary knowledge about the size of the new-config-area; and I
didnt know how to do the beginning: it seemed like the first few blocks need a
special treatment, because there the new-config-area and the old-config-area
overlap)...

But Veronica is developing a tool, that can do it in offline mode... With
service interruption...

But growfs induces a service interruption anyway and it is buggy, if u do not
zero the new area... Veronica filed a bug report about this...

Nowadays it is common practice to have 2 ot more hosts, that can substitute
each other (hot-standby or how they call it today), so that it doesnt matter,
if a box is damaged or in maintenance mode or... isnt it?

P. S.: "It is... lovely weather we are having. I hope the weather continues."
(taken from "The Pink Panther (2006)") *rotfl*

Bye
Arne


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. 
Make Yahoo! your homepage.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, fluffles.net, (Tue Nov 6, 7:16 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, John Nielsen, (Tue Nov 6, 11:17 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Arne W, (Tue Nov 6, 12:33 pm)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Nikolay Pavlov, (Tue Nov 6, 2:00 pm)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Ivan Voras, (Wed Nov 7, 3:48 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Arne W, (Wed Nov 7, 5:17 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Ivan Voras, (Wed Nov 7, 5:50 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Arne W, (Wed Nov 7, 5:56 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, 韓家標 Bill Hacker, (Wed Nov 7, 6:08 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Ivan Voras, (Wed Nov 7, 6:23 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, 韓家標 Bill Hacker, (Wed Nov 7, 7:01 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Ulf Lilleengen, (Wed Nov 7, 10:09 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Arne W, (Wed Nov 7, 11:57 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Ulf Lilleengen, (Wed Nov 7, 2:06 pm)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Arne W, (Wed Nov 7, 3:16 pm)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Oliver Fromme, (Wed Nov 14, 11:53 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Arne W, (Wed Nov 14, 12:10 pm)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Oliver Fromme, (Thu Nov 15, 8:14 am)
Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?, Arne W, (Thu Nov 15, 9:05 am)