On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 15:33 +0100, Pieter de Goeje wrote:

quoted text
> This commit to sys/vm/vm_object.c fixed it:
>=20
> revision 1.386
> date: 2007/10/18 23:02:18;  author: alc;  state: Exp;  lines: +2 -1
> The previous revision, updating vm_object_page_remove() for the new page
> cache, did not account for the case where the vm object has nothing but
> cached pages.
>=20
> Reported by:    kris, tegge
> Reviewed by:    tegge
>=20
> If you want I can still do a search for the commit that introduced the=20
> problem, but I think this gives a rather strong clue on what caused it :)
>=20
> Pieter de Goeje

We really really really appreciate your help with this.  Thank you VERY
much!

--=20
                                                Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to      |       kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
  there, funny things are everywhere.   |
                      - Theodore Geisel |