login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
freebsd-current
»
2007
»
October
»
17
Re: PCC and FreeBSD in the future?
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Brooks Davis <brooks@...>
To: David Leimbach <leimy2k@...>
Cc: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@...>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@...>, Ed Schouten <ed@...>, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <wearabnet@...>
Subject:
Re: PCC and FreeBSD in the future?
Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 - 6:00 pm
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 02:28:01PM -0700, David Leimbach wrote:
quoted text
> On 10/17/07, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 08:27:58PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > > > * Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> wrote: > > > > One of the major obstacles for PCC is that it didn't support a way =
to
quoted text
> > > > pack structures in a comfortable way. Most of the FreeBSD userland > > just > > > > built with it. Most of the stuff that didn't compile properly, was > > > > related to kernel headers, using __attribute__ stuff, instead of the > > > > cdef'd stuff, like __packed. It seems things have changed in the me=
an
quoted text
> > > > time. > > > > > > Indeed; PCC now supports _Pragma("packed"). I've attached a patch for > > > sys/cdefs.h that should make at least src/bin compile like it should. > > > The patch is in no way meant to be complete. > > > > on the other hand llvm-gcc (and clang in the near future) compiles > > basically > > everything out of the box + its highly optimizing (yet still much faster > > than > > gcc) + BSD licensed.. ;) > > >=20 > It's derived from gcc yet BSD licensed? Erm, how?
The gcc frontend option is GPL licensed, but the rest of the system is BSD licensed including the clang frontend (not yet complete). -- Brooks
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
PCC and FreeBSD in the future?
, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri...
, (Wed Oct 17, 12:33 pm)
Re: PCC and FreeBSD in the future?
, Ed Schouten
, (Wed Oct 17, 1:39 pm)
Re: PCC and FreeBSD in the future?
, Ed Schouten
, (Wed Oct 17, 2:27 pm)
Re: PCC and FreeBSD in the future?
, Roman Divacky
, (Wed Oct 17, 4:34 pm)
Re: PCC and FreeBSD in the future?
, David Leimbach
, (Wed Oct 17, 5:28 pm)
Re: PCC and FreeBSD in the future?
, Brooks Davis
, (Wed Oct 17, 6:00 pm)
Re: PCC and FreeBSD in the future?
, David Leimbach
, (Wed Oct 17, 6:29 pm)
Re: PCC and FreeBSD in the future?
, Steve Kargl
, (Wed Oct 17, 5:52 pm)
Re: PCC and FreeBSD in the future?
, David Leimbach
, (Wed Oct 17, 6:25 pm)
Re: PCC and FreeBSD in the future?
, Steve Kargl
, (Wed Oct 17, 6:40 pm)
Re: PCC and FreeBSD in the future?
, David Leimbach
, (Wed Oct 17, 7:21 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Tarkan Erimer
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
clameter
[31/36] Large Blocksize: Core piece
David Woodhouse
Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in mor...
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
KOSAKI Motohiro
[bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin"
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
6 users
and
907 guests
online.
Online users
cordic
silkinmanageme
zeekec
privacycontrol
glowinthedarkyh
autoinsurancrfb
Syndicate