Re: suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE lines

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Christian Baer <christian.baer@...>
Cc: <freebsd-current@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 - 11:57 am

Hello,

Christian Baer wrote:
This was discussed many times in -stable mail list (and probably on few 
others?)
Anyway STABLE means stable API, so programs compiled on 6.2-RELEASE 
should work on 6.2-STABLE

You can look for "ARRRRGH!  Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR 
code?!" - very long thread,
but normally when something broke in -stable this thread start and start 
again.

P.S. for me STABLE is very stable, and current CURRENT is even more 
stable (at least on new hardware),
and I have both in production.

-- 

Best Wishes,
Stefan Lambrev
ICQ# 24134177

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE ..., Stefan Lambrev, (Wed Oct 10, 11:57 am)
Re: suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE ..., Dag-Erling Smørgrav, (Wed Oct 10, 10:39 am)
Re: suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE ..., Matthew D. Fuller, (Wed Oct 10, 7:16 pm)