| From | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Martin Tournoij | Stop Adobe Flash Petition
Sign it here:
http://www.petitiononline.com/0034655a/petition.html
The number of Adobe Flash sites are growing, and an increasing
amount of sites will simply cease to function when Flash is disabled
or unavailable.
I would like to call to all web developers to (re)consider their use
of Flash, while it does have place on the web, it is often used in the
wrong way, on the wrong place, in a badly implemented manner.
Why I dislike flash:
o It often adds little or nothing to a website, mo...
| Jun 26, 6:39 am 2008 |
| KAYVEN RIESE | Re: Stop Adobe Flash Petition
[coment(s) below]
Maybe I am missing something, but isn't the petition about getting
the FreeBSD desktop to be able to view flash sites (I hope so). If
I am mistaken, I apologize for my OT spam. I have a bunch of those
emails sitting in my box and I am just now bursting to make a
comment here. I _really_ hope that some bounty gets paid or something
that implies that I will be able to do cvsup or patch or whatever
Oh dear. This could be the intractable part of the problem for the
time bei...
| Jun 26, 3:05 pm 2008 |
| Lars Engels | Re: Stop Adobe Flash Petition
While I totally agree to the above statements, tell me the sense of an =20
online petition. Do you know a single petition that changed _anything_?
The petition is adressed "Web Designers". How should they get aware of =20
the petition?
You cannot change the internet with that. Every big commercial site =20
has flash. It's colorful, it's loud, it attracts the people to their =20
products. So you won't convince the webmaster of these sites to change.
Flash sucks but we can't avoid it. :-(
| Jun 26, 7:28 am 2008 |
| Martin Tournoij | Re: Stop Adobe Flash Petition
Of course it won't cause a paradigm shift, but it can be used to show
that many people/users are not at all impressed but annoyed with
"sleak" flash sites, which might just be enough to convince a few
people/sites.
Even if only manages to convince a few people .. Is it not worth your
Actually, that's not true, big commercial sites are usable because
more usability == more profit, and since flash != usable, flash ==
less profit.
Big sites like Amazon, Ebay, Google, Yahoo, etc. are all relativ...
| Jun 26, 8:01 am 2008 |
| Alphons "Fonz&q... | Re: Stop Adobe Flash Petition
That probably has a lot to do with it. I think it's often not so much the
actual webdesigners but rather their customers (i.e. the companies hiring
them) who request Flash because it looks good, not having a clue about its
disadvantages.
Alphons
P.S. There was a long thread about this subject on -questions not so long
ago, which can probably be found in the archives.
--
If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming.
If you want to experience the element, get out of ...
| Jun 26, 8:48 am 2008 |
| Unga | Re: Supercomputing with FreeBSD?
Its finally very good to note people who know how to do it are being working on it.
At a time Linux is either fading or struggling on desktop, and at a time Linux developers have to beg for OEMs for open source drivers that they never get, it is the undeniable responsibility of the FreeBSD developers who know how to clear those issues to clear it and make the infrastructure ready for OEMs to develop drivers for FreeBSD.
Success of the FreeBSD based desktop depends on the availability of drivers dir...
| Jun 26, 12:25 am 2008 |
| Dag-Erling Smørgrav | Re: Supercomputing with FreeBSD?
Linux is neither failing nor struggling on the desktop, nor do the major
Linux does not "legally demand" open source drivers.
In fact, since Linux's kernel API and ABI are far more stable than
FreeBSD's, it is much easier to maintain binary drivers for Linux than
Name one example...
Some game publishers have released 64-bit versions of selected games,
but nobody would even dream of releasing a 64-bit-only game. It would
be suicide. Even though > 90% of computers sold today are 64-bit
...
| Jun 26, 4:58 am 2008 |
| previous day | today | next day |
|---|---|---|
| June 23, 2008 | June 26, 2008 | June 27, 2008 |
| Dave Hansen | [RFC][PATCH 0/4] kernel-based checkpoint restart |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Eric Paris | [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
