login
Header Space

 
 

Re: rsync vs. cvsup benchmarks

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <users@...>
Date: Thursday, January 31, 2008 - 9:27 pm

> I have some benchmark test results comparing rsync to cvsup.  

...

okay.. so like:

you'd think with all of these repository copies flying around,
there'd be a lot less flaming and a lot more coding going on..

enough!

sheesh.. You people are making me want to write this email

IN EMACS

and,

WE ALL KNOW HOW HORRIBLE EMACS IS !!!

especially

WHEN COMPARED TO VI !!!

and also, just to finish this off (for now:)

People on each side are LIKE NAZIS

etc, etc, etc.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
rsync vs. cvsup benchmarks, Vincent Stemen, (Wed Jan 30, 2:38 am)
Re: rsync vs. cvsup benchmarks, Chris Turner, (Thu Jan 31, 9:27 pm)
Re: rsync vs. cvsup benchmarks, Bill Hacker, (Fri Feb 1, 1:46 am)
Re: rsync vs. cvsup benchmarks, Garance A Drosihn, (Wed Jan 30, 5:55 pm)
Re: rsync vs. cvsup benchmarks, Justin C. Sherrill, (Wed Jan 30, 9:46 am)
Re: rsync vs. cvsup benchmarks, Simon 'corecode' Schubert..., (Wed Jan 30, 10:20 am)
rsync considered superior (was: Re: rsync vs. cvsup benchmar..., Simon 'corecode' Schubert..., (Wed Jan 30, 7:54 am)
Re: rsync considered superior, Bill Hacker, (Wed Jan 30, 10:45 am)
Re: rsync considered superior, Simon 'corecode' Schubert..., (Wed Jan 30, 11:20 am)
Re: rsync considered superior, Bill Hacker, (Wed Jan 30, 1:35 pm)
speck-geostationary