Re: Plans for 1.8+ (2.0?)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Matthieu Guéguen
Date: Thursday, February 1, 2007 - 9:32 am

On 2/1/07, Simon 'corecode' Schubert <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de> wrote:

Yes, I second that. Maybe ZFS could be improved to handle the problems
Matt listed. And I think it could be easier than creating a whole new
filesystem (and test this new FS, tune it, write tools for it...).

By the way, congrats to all DragonFly developers for this 1.8 release !
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Plans for 1.8+ (2.0?), Matthew Dillon, (Wed Jan 31, 1:18 pm)
Re: Plans for 1.8+ (2.0?), ricardo, (Wed Jan 31, 7:33 pm)
Re: Plans for 1.8+ (2.0?), Justin C. Sherrill, (Wed Jan 31, 7:35 pm)
Was: Plans for 1.8+ (2.0?) Now: Filesystem support?, Peter Serwe, (Wed Jan 31, 7:48 pm)
Re: Plans for 1.8+ (2.0?), Dmitri Nikulin, (Thu Feb 1, 1:20 am)
Re: Plans for 1.8+ (2.0?), Bill Hacker, (Thu Feb 1, 4:16 am)
Re: Plans for 1.8+ (2.0?), Simon 'corecode' Sch ..., (Thu Feb 1, 7:39 am)
Re: Plans for 1.8+ (2.0?), Justin C. Sherrill, (Thu Feb 1, 7:39 am)
Re: Plans for 1.8+ (2.0?), Matthieu Guéguen, (Thu Feb 1, 9:32 am)
Re: Plans for 1.8+ (2.0?), Chris Csanady, (Thu Feb 1, 10:34 am)
Re: Plans for 1.8+ (2.0?), Bill Hacker, (Thu Feb 1, 12:08 pm)