dragonflybsd-kernel mailing list

FromSubjectsort iconDate
Pedro F. Giffuni
Re: FreeBSD SUJ
Well ... SUJ has brought some fixes to softupdates, besides ... Sometimes there are advantages in having more than one filesystem ;-). Pedro.
Apr 25, 9:58 am 2010
Justin C. Sherrill
Re: FreeBSD SUJ
Would we want to? We're moving farther and farther down the Hammer route. Matt did some journaling work back in 2005-2006, but that hasn't continued, and nobody's missed it. I'm sure there's counter-arguments I'm missing.
Apr 24, 5:38 pm 2010
Matthew Dillon
Re: FreeBSD SUJ
Jeff's SUJ work is for UFS I believe, and is heavily integrated into softupdates. It is a partial solution to UFS's fsck issue which, with some more work, could potentially become a full solution. We basically do not use UFS any more except for /boot or on very small drives. HAMMER is used for anything bigger than 50G or so. I stopped bringing in UFS stuff several years ago (prior to the UFS snapshots and background fsck) and I really don't want to bring in ...
Apr 24, 10:30 pm 2010
Pedro F. Giffuni Apr 25, 9:46 am 2010
Thomas E. Spanjaard
Re: FreeBSD SUJ
Is it like WAPBL? -- Thomas E. Spanjaard tgen@netphreax.net tgen@deepbone.net
Apr 25, 4:32 am 2010
Greg 'groggy' Lehey
Re: FreeBSD SUJ
It's probably worth letting the FreeBSD project shake out most of the bugs first. Greg -- Finger grog@FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/email/signed-mail.php for more details. If your Microsoft MUA reports problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua
Apr 24, 5:55 pm 2010
previous daytodaynext day
April 24, 2010April 25, 2010April 26, 2010