| From | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Pedro F. Giffuni | Re: FreeBSD SUJ
Well ...
SUJ has brought some fixes to softupdates, besides ...
Sometimes there are advantages in having more than one filesystem ;-).
Pedro.
| Apr 25, 9:58 am 2010 |
| Justin C. Sherrill | Re: FreeBSD SUJ
Would we want to? We're moving farther and farther down the Hammer route.
Matt did some journaling work back in 2005-2006, but that hasn't
continued, and nobody's missed it. I'm sure there's counter-arguments I'm
missing.
| Apr 24, 5:38 pm 2010 |
| Matthew Dillon | Re: FreeBSD SUJ
Jeff's SUJ work is for UFS I believe, and is heavily integrated into
softupdates. It is a partial solution to UFS's fsck issue which, with
some more work, could potentially become a full solution.
We basically do not use UFS any more except for /boot or on very small
drives. HAMMER is used for anything bigger than 50G or so.
I stopped bringing in UFS stuff several years ago (prior to the UFS
snapshots and background fsck) and I really don't want to bring in
...
| Apr 24, 10:30 pm 2010 |
| Pedro F. Giffuni | Re: FreeBSD SUJ
Not really... it's lighter:
http://jeffr-tech.livejournal.com/
| Apr 25, 9:46 am 2010 |
| Thomas E. Spanjaard | Apr 25, 4:32 am 2010 | |
| Greg 'groggy' Lehey | Re: FreeBSD SUJ
It's probably worth letting the FreeBSD project shake out most of the
bugs first.
Greg
--
Finger grog@FreeBSD.org for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
This message is digitally signed. See
http://www.lemis.com/grog/email/signed-mail.php for more details.
If your Microsoft MUA reports problems, please read
http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua
| Apr 24, 5:55 pm 2010 |
| previous day | today | next day |
|---|---|---|
| April 24, 2010 | April 25, 2010 | April 26, 2010 |
