Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <kernel@...>
Date: Saturday, July 26, 2008 - 9:50 pm

Matthew Dillon wrote:
,

Well, ZFS itself isn't that integrated as it's said. You can use the=20
low-level volume manager by itself and create UFS volumes on top of it.=20
It isn't as straightforward as a simple volume manager since you still=20
get the superfluous caching and checksumming but it works.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design, Matthew Dillon, (Sat Jul 26, 8:50 pm)
Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design, Ivan Voras, (Sat Jul 26, 9:50 pm)
Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design, Daniel Phillips, (Sat Jul 26, 11:02 pm)