Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Pedro F. Giffuni <pfgshield-freebsd@...>

To: <kernel@...>

Subject: Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design

Date: Saturday, July 26, 2008 - 1:02 am

Matthew Dillon wrote:
..
quoted text> 
>     I do wish we had something like LVM on BSD systems.  You guys are very
>     lucky in that regard.  LVM is really nice.
> 

AFAICT, there are patches for NetBSD:

http://netbsd-soc.sourceforge.net/projects/lvm/

enjoy,

     Pedro.

ps. Feel free to drop me from the CC list, I'm happily following the 
group :).

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design, Matthew Dillon, (Fri Jul 25, 10:02 pm)

Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design, Daniel Phillips, (Sun Jul 27, 7:51 am)

Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design, Pedro F. Giffuni, (Sat Jul 26, 1:02 am)


linux-kernel:
Tarkan Erimer	Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Greg KH	[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
clameter	[31/36] Large Blocksize: Core piece
David Woodhouse	Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in mor...
git:

linux-netdev:

Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
KOSAKI Motohiro	[bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin"
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
openbsd-misc:

Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design

Online users