On Sunday 08 June 2008, Aggelos Economopoulos wrote: [...]And the reason for that can be found at http://wiki.dragonflybsd.org/index.cgi/NetMP One issue I forgot to mention is that I haven't updated some obscure protocols to the new interface. Do we care about ncp/ipx and friends? I very much doubt anyone is using them on DragonFly, so there's a good chance they're broken in HEAD too. Also, I don't know how they're supposed to work or how to set them up and test them. In any case, I think it would be a waste of time. At this point they are mostly a maintainance burden. Is there any objection to removing them? SCTP is another protocol I've broken, but this is different because SCTP may become relevant. Does anyone use SCTP on DragonFly now? Updating it may not be exactly trivial; it seems to be very intimate with the sockbuf internals. If anyone wants to give it a try, please step forward! I think my time would be better spent elsewere (it's not as if I can easily test SCTP anyway). Aggelos
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
