Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 6:39 pm

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Michael Galassi <nerd@xyz.com> wrote:

I was talking specifically about the string handling, not the whole
language. In the case of strings, the discipline and attention to
detail are apparently not enough (because the standard string handling
functions make it too easy to make buffer-overflow bugs), as the
myriads of buffer overflow exploits prove. Nothing wrong with using
alternative string handling in C.



-- 
Dan
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Matthew Dillon, (Tue Jun 3, 12:41 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Max Lindner, (Tue Jun 10, 7:27 am)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Dan M, (Wed Jun 11, 4:15 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, strangepics, (Wed Jun 11, 5:36 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Joerg Sonnenberger, (Wed Jun 11, 5:49 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Dan M, (Wed Jun 11, 6:20 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Michael Galassi, (Wed Jun 11, 6:30 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Dan M, (Wed Jun 11, 6:39 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Simon corecode Schubert, (Tue Jun 10, 10:22 am)