Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Michael Galassi
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 3:30 pm

>It's unfortunate that they are ignored. libowfat and the like are just

I can usually hold my tongue, but...

The C standard is a fine standard for a low level language that by
design lets you hang yourself.  If you don't like it go write something
in java or something like that.  What is lacking in your case is the
discipline and attention to detail to recognize possibly hazardous
situations and code defensively.

-michael
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Matthew Dillon, (Tue Jun 3, 9:41 am)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Max Lindner, (Tue Jun 10, 4:27 am)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Simon corecode Schubert, (Tue Jun 10, 7:22 am)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Dan M, (Wed Jun 11, 1:15 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, strangepics, (Wed Jun 11, 2:36 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Joerg Sonnenberger, (Wed Jun 11, 2:49 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Dan M, (Wed Jun 11, 3:20 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Michael Galassi, (Wed Jun 11, 3:30 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Dan M, (Wed Jun 11, 3:39 pm)