Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Max Lindner
Date: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 - 4:27 am

Hi out there!

Seems that the general tenor goes to a separate utility/helper
application with suid-bit set which takes over the steps where
root-access is compulsory. I will take a look at qmail which seems to
have a similar design (as I read in the other dma thread which came up
last week).

But I need some input if the ~/.forward file is considered as strictly
private and its contents should not be revealed under no
circumstances. With this design one can strace/debug the process
running and see the contents of another users .forward file. In my
understanding there is nothing bad about revealing the contents of the
~/.forward file to other users. If someone wants to hide his extern
final recipient-email-address, he can use an freemail account or
something like this as a redirect service but I can't think about a
scenario where this should be neccessary.

Greetings,
Max
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Matthew Dillon, (Tue Jun 3, 9:41 am)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Max Lindner, (Tue Jun 10, 4:27 am)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Simon corecode Schubert, (Tue Jun 10, 7:22 am)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Dan M, (Wed Jun 11, 1:15 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, strangepics, (Wed Jun 11, 2:36 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Joerg Sonnenberger, (Wed Jun 11, 2:49 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Dan M, (Wed Jun 11, 3:20 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Michael Galassi, (Wed Jun 11, 3:30 pm)
Re: GSoC 2008 dma enhancements, Dan M, (Wed Jun 11, 3:39 pm)