Re: FairQ ALTQ for PF - Patch #2

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <kernel@...>
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 11:51 am

Matthew Dillon wrote:

I concur.  Keep state should be explicit.  Furthermore, I don't expect
keep state not to work across reboots.  That's why I then write keep
state flags S/SA.  Something clearly need to be untangled here.  Keep
state should keep state as good as possible, but not reject connections.

cheers
  simon
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: FairQ ALTQ for PF - Patch #2, Matthew Dillon, (Mon Apr 7, 11:05 am)
Re: FairQ ALTQ for PF - Patch #2, Simon 'corecode' Schubert..., (Mon Apr 7, 11:51 am)
Re: FairQ ALTQ for PF - Patch #2, Max Laier, (Mon Apr 7, 11:53 am)