Re: FairQ ALTQ for PF - Patch #2

Previous thread: Re: FairQ ALTQ for PF - Patch #2 by Matthew Dillon on Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:05 am. (3 messages)

Next thread: PF PICKUPS patch #1 by Matthew Dillon on Monday, April 7, 2008 - 10:05 am. (1 message)
From: Matthew Dillon
Date: Monday, April 7, 2008 - 9:57 am

Done, thank you!  Initial patch set will be posted in follow-up in

    Yes, I see the reasoning behind keep state.  If keep state were on
    by default, though, I think I'd want it to be pickups rather then
    no-pickups.  I just can't wrap my head around it blowing up TCP
    connections.  However, if one explicitly specified a keep state
    directive for a rule, I agree the default should be no-pickups.

						-Matt

Previous thread: Re: FairQ ALTQ for PF - Patch #2 by Matthew Dillon on Monday, April 7, 2008 - 8:05 am. (3 messages)

Next thread: PF PICKUPS patch #1 by Matthew Dillon on Monday, April 7, 2008 - 10:05 am. (1 message)