Re: FairQ ALTQ for PF - Patch #2

Previous thread: Re: FairQ ALTQ for PF - Patch #2 by Matthew Dillon on Sunday, April 6, 2008 - 6:26 pm. (2 messages)

Next thread: 3ware support for newer cards? by Dave Hayes on Sunday, April 6, 2008 - 10:38 pm. (1 message)
From: Matthew Dillon
Date: Sunday, April 6, 2008 - 7:48 pm

I will go this route, adding state-opts for reduced-state tracking.

    I agree, they are orthogonal.  The issues simply need to be documented
    properly (S/SA verses reduced-state verses classifying the bucket for
    fairq, etc).

    I just had an evil thought.  One could have additional flags to tell
    it to track even more reduced state... as in, just IP-IP traffic, or
    by source or destination IP only, as a means of classifying the 
    hoppers for fair-q.  It is certainly food for thought and might even
    be worth implementing queue recursion.  Overall queue for IP, sub-queues
    for connections from IP.  Hmm.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>
Previous thread: Re: FairQ ALTQ for PF - Patch #2 by Matthew Dillon on Sunday, April 6, 2008 - 6:26 pm. (2 messages)

Next thread: 3ware support for newer cards? by Dave Hayes on Sunday, April 6, 2008 - 10:38 pm. (1 message)