Re: panic: assertion: hammer_btree_cmp(cursor->left_bound, &cursor->node->ondisk->elms[0].leaf.base) <= 0 in btree_split_leaf

Previous thread: Re: panic: assertion: hammer_btree_cmp(cursor->left_bound, &cursor->node->ondisk->elms[0].leaf.base) <= 0 in btree_split_leaf by Matthew Dillon on Wednesday, March 19, 2008 - 4:54 pm. (1 message)

Next thread: Jail uname spoofing / misc by Chris Turner on Sunday, March 23, 2008 - 12:36 pm. (8 messages)

Ok, I believe I have fixed the left_bound assertion. I also believe
I have fixed the node ref count assertion on umount.

There is currently one unfixed assertion related to the I/O
path... sometimes the bp is being improperly disassociated from the
related HAMMER structure.

The full-filesystem case is still not being handled so don't test that :-)

-Matt

Previous thread: Re: panic: assertion: hammer_btree_cmp(cursor->left_bound, &cursor->node->ondisk->elms[0].leaf.base) <= 0 in btree_split_leaf by Matthew Dillon on Wednesday, March 19, 2008 - 4:54 pm. (1 message)

Next thread: Jail uname spoofing / misc by Chris Turner on Sunday, March 23, 2008 - 12:36 pm. (8 messages)