On Thursday 07 February 2008, Matthias Schmidt wrote:There's always the option of releasing a 1.12 version now (it's not like there haven't been enough changes to justify a new release). The 2.0 release is likely to get a lot of downloads, so I think shipping it with a pre-alpha hammer is a waste of an opportunity to attract more people. Not to mention that it's hard to put a time bound on this kind of development. So, let's just admit that and ship 2.0 as soon as Matt declares it ready for beta testing, regardless of what time of year it is. A real beta-state hammer justifies a 2.0 release on its own IMHO. Also, this will let Matt work on hammer without any tight deadlines. Aggelos
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Christoph Lameter | [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support) |
| Chuck Ebbert | Re: Linux 2.6.21 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Hugh Dickins | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
